An anti-genealogical take on US anthropology and disciplinary reform: From anti-racism to decolonization

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The “decolonizing generation” is a critical new movement that has captured the imaginations of many younger scholars. While the author would like to consider herself an older member of this generation, she questions whether this moment needs periodization. Is today's moment really so different from the past, when we saw the rise of world anthropologies, postmodernism, the crisis in representation, neo-Marxism, and anti-racist movements? And what is meant by “decolonizing anthropology” when experiences with colonialism and decolonization differ around the world? While acknowledging the value of reforming the discipline, the author encourages her colleagues to separate the very important critique of anthropologists’ gatekeeping practices from idealized renderings of what anthropology should be. Rather than decolonization, the discipline ought to focus on establishing a continual decentering of hegemonic knowledge production.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)356-367
    Number of pages12
    JournalAmerican Ethnologist
    Volume50
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 2023

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Anthropology

    Keywords

    • decolonization
    • history of anthropology
    • methods
    • world anthropologies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An anti-genealogical take on US anthropology and disciplinary reform: From anti-racism to decolonization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this