An anti-genealogical take on US anthropology and disciplinary reform: From anti-racism to decolonization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The “decolonizing generation” is a critical new movement that has captured the imaginations of many younger scholars. While the author would like to consider herself an older member of this generation, she questions whether this moment needs periodization. Is today's moment really so different from the past, when we saw the rise of world anthropologies, postmodernism, the crisis in representation, neo-Marxism, and anti-racist movements? And what is meant by “decolonizing anthropology” when experiences with colonialism and decolonization differ around the world? While acknowledging the value of reforming the discipline, the author encourages her colleagues to separate the very important critique of anthropologists’ gatekeeping practices from idealized renderings of what anthropology should be. Rather than decolonization, the discipline ought to focus on establishing a continual decentering of hegemonic knowledge production.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-367
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Ethnologist
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology

Keywords

  • decolonization
  • history of anthropology
  • methods
  • world anthropologies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An anti-genealogical take on US anthropology and disciplinary reform: From anti-racism to decolonization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this