TY - JOUR
T1 - Alkali‐activated materials
T2 - The role of molecular‐scale research and lessons from the energy transition to combat climate change
AU - White, Claire E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This Letter was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 1553607 and 1727346. CEW would like to thank Prof. Chris Greig and Dr. Eric Larson for discussions on the energy sector and data sources, and Prof. Jannie S. J. van Deventer for providing insightful feedback on a draft version of the Letter. CEW also acknowledges the work performed by Dr. Nishant Garg and Mr. Kengran Yang, specifically the ICC and PDF data (Dr. Garg) and pore structure data (Mr. Yang).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, RILEM Publications SARL. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/5/16
Y1 - 2019/5/16
N2 - Alternative (i.e., non‐Portland) cements, such as alkali‐activated materials, have gained significant interest from the scientific community due to their proven CO2 savings compared with Portland cement together with known short‐term performance properties. However, the concrete industry remains dominated by Portland cement‐based concrete. This Letter explores the technical and non‐technical hurdles preventing implementation of an alternative cement, such as alkali‐activated materials, in the concrete industry and discusses how these hurdles can be overcome. Specifically, it is shown that certain technical hurdles, such as a lack of understanding how certain additives affect setting of alkali‐activated materials (and Portland cement) and the absence of long‐term in‐field performance data of these sustainable cements, can be mitigated via the use of key molecular‐ and nano‐scale experimental techniques to elucidate dominant material characteristics, including those that control long‐term performance. In the second part of this Letter the concrete industry is compared and contrasted with the electricity generation industry, and specifically the transition from one dominant technology (i.e., coal) to a diverse array of energy sources including renewables. It is concluded that financial incentives and public advocacy (akin to advocacy for renewables in the energy sector) would significantly enhance uptake of alternative cements in the concrete industry.
AB - Alternative (i.e., non‐Portland) cements, such as alkali‐activated materials, have gained significant interest from the scientific community due to their proven CO2 savings compared with Portland cement together with known short‐term performance properties. However, the concrete industry remains dominated by Portland cement‐based concrete. This Letter explores the technical and non‐technical hurdles preventing implementation of an alternative cement, such as alkali‐activated materials, in the concrete industry and discusses how these hurdles can be overcome. Specifically, it is shown that certain technical hurdles, such as a lack of understanding how certain additives affect setting of alkali‐activated materials (and Portland cement) and the absence of long‐term in‐field performance data of these sustainable cements, can be mitigated via the use of key molecular‐ and nano‐scale experimental techniques to elucidate dominant material characteristics, including those that control long‐term performance. In the second part of this Letter the concrete industry is compared and contrasted with the electricity generation industry, and specifically the transition from one dominant technology (i.e., coal) to a diverse array of energy sources including renewables. It is concluded that financial incentives and public advocacy (akin to advocacy for renewables in the energy sector) would significantly enhance uptake of alternative cements in the concrete industry.
KW - Alkali‐activated concrete
KW - Alternative cements
KW - Durability
KW - Materials science
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089259763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089259763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2019.98
DO - 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2019.98
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089259763
SN - 2518-0231
VL - 4
SP - 110
EP - 121
JO - RILEM Technical Letters
JF - RILEM Technical Letters
ER -