Abstract
How are we to decide where our scarce medical resources are most effectively spent? The notion of a quality-adjusted-life-year has been proposed as a way of doing this. Some economists appear to think that this can be done without making ethical assumptions. We examine the application of this notion to the treatment of premature newborns, and especially to comparisons between the value of medical care for newborns, and the value of medical care for older people. We find that some highly questionable ethical assumptions are inovled in such comparisons.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-116 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of Medicine and Philosophy |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1988 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Medicine
Keywords
- Elderly
- Health care
- Justice
- Resource allocation