Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level

Thomas L. Griffiths

doi:10.1017/S0140525X19002012

Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level

Thomas L. Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The commentaries raised questions about normativity, human rationality, cognitive architectures, cognitive constraints, and the scope or resource rational analysis (RRA). We respond to these questions and clarify that RRA is a methodological advance that extends the scope of rational modeling to understanding cognitive processes, why they differ between people, why they change over time, and how they could be improved.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	e27
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	43
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19002012
State	Published - 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X19002012

Cite this

@article{fecbc1568a7340a792854be01238a135,

title = "Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level",

abstract = "The commentaries raised questions about normativity, human rationality, cognitive architectures, cognitive constraints, and the scope or resource rational analysis (RRA). We respond to these questions and clarify that RRA is a methodological advance that extends the scope of rational modeling to understanding cognitive processes, why they differ between people, why they change over time, and how they could be improved.",

author = "Griffiths, {Thomas L.}",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X19002012",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level

AU - Griffiths, Thomas L.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The commentaries raised questions about normativity, human rationality, cognitive architectures, cognitive constraints, and the scope or resource rational analysis (RRA). We respond to these questions and clarify that RRA is a methodological advance that extends the scope of rational modeling to understanding cognitive processes, why they differ between people, why they change over time, and how they could be improved.

AB - The commentaries raised questions about normativity, human rationality, cognitive architectures, cognitive constraints, and the scope or resource rational analysis (RRA). We respond to these questions and clarify that RRA is a methodological advance that extends the scope of rational modeling to understanding cognitive processes, why they differ between people, why they change over time, and how they could be improved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081945911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081945911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X19002012

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X19002012

M3 - Article

C2 - 32159501

AN - SCOPUS:85081945911

VL - 43

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

M1 - e27

ER -

Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this