Abstract
Participants' faces were covertly recorded while they rated the attractiveness of people, the decorative appeal of paintings, and the cuteness of animals. Ratings employed a continuous scale. The same participants then returned and tried to guess ratings from 3-s videotapes of themselves and other targets. Performance was above chance in all three stimulus categories, thereby replicating the results of an earlier study (North et al. in J Exp Soc Psychol 46(6):1109-1113, 2010) but this time using a more sensitive rating procedure. Across conditions, accuracy in reading one's own face was not reliably better than other-accuracy. We discuss our findings in the context of "simulation" theories of face-based emotion recognition (Goldman in The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006) and the larger body of accuracy research.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 227-233 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Nonverbal Behavior |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
Keywords
- Accuracy
- Face perception
- Facial expressions
- Self-accuracy
- Social cognition