Abstract
This is a critical analysis of John Rawls's A Theory of Justice. Rawls offers a theoretical justification of social democratic principles of justice. He argues that they are the principles which rational men would choose, under defined constraints, in an original position of social contract. The author criticises Rawls's assumption that men of any background, of any socialisation, would choose these principles in the original position. He argues that the choice which Rawls imputes to his contractors reflects a specific socialisation - one dominant in Western democracies. The theory is useful because it systematises a particular sense of justice; it is in no sense however a universal theory.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 311-324 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Theory and Decision |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1974 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Decision Sciences
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Applied Psychology
- Computer Science Applications
- General Social Sciences