Abstract
It is a common practice in finance to estimate volatility from the sum of frequently sampled squared returns. However, market microstructure poses challenges to this estimation approach, as evidenced by recent empirical studies in finance. The present work attempts to lay out theoretical grounds that reconcile continuous-time modeling and discrete-time samples. We propose an estimation approach that takes advantage of the rich sources in tick-by-tick data while preserving the continuous-time assumption on the underlying returns. Under our framework, it becomes clear why and where the "usual" volatility estimator fails when the returns are sampled at the highest frequencies. If the noise is asymptotically small, our work provides a way of finding the optimal sampling frequency. A better approach, the "two-scales estimator," works for any size of the noise.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1394-1411 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of the American Statistical Association |
Volume | 100 |
Issue number | 472 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2005 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Keywords
- Bias-correction
- Market microstructure
- Martingale
- Measurement error
- Realized volatility
- Subsampling