Abstract
Theories of how people learn relationships between continuous variables have tended to focus on two possibilities: one, that people are estimating explicit functions, or two that they are performing associative learning supported by similarity. We provide a rational analysis of function learning, drawing on work on regression in machine learning and statistics. Using the equivalence of Bayesian linear regression and Gaussian processes, which provide a probabilistic basis for similarity-based function learning, we show that learning explicit rules and using similarity can be seen as two views of one solution to this problem. We use this insight to define a rational model of human function learning that combines the strengths of both approaches and accounts for a wide variety of experimental results.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1193-1215 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Psychonomic Bulletin and Review |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 26 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
Keywords
- Bayesian modeling
- Function learning