A Pragmatic Genealogy of Rule-Following

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

How do creatures like us intentionally track certain properties when we use words to predicate them, yet have no means of defining those terms? This is the rule-following problem posed by Wittgenstein and Kripke. The answer defended is that we do so as a byproduct of practices that are well-documented as common across our species: sensitization, joint action, and teaching and learning. We can be sensitized to instances of a property or class, as even a simple animal can be sensitized under conditioning. Being committed to acting jointly with one another, we can become aware of such a class as an abstract entity. And being creatures who teach and learn from one another, within and across generations, we can recognize that if we diverge in assignments to a class, predications of a property, then at least one of us is not operating properly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNeopragmatism
Subtitle of host publicationInterventions in First-Order Philosophy
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages141-169
Number of pages29
ISBN (Electronic)9780191915673
ISBN (Print)9780192894809
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Keywords

  • apprentice learning
  • joint action
  • Kripke
  • realism
  • rule-following
  • sensitization
  • triangulation
  • Wittgenstein

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Pragmatic Genealogy of Rule-Following'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this