Abstract
We carried out a comprehensive analysis to examine the phase error variances in three adaptive phase estimation (PE) methods: the adaptive decision-aided PE, the Kalman PE, and the normalized least-mean square PE algorithms. The results show that they share the same phase error variances but with different approaches to determine the stepsize. Their performances in different quadrature amplitude modulation formats are analytically investigated for the purpose of determining the laser linewidth tolerance.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 5703109 |
Pages (from-to) | 462-464 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | IEEE Photonics Technology Letters |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Keywords
- Adaptive receiver
- coherent detection
- laser phase noise
- phase estimation (PE)
- quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM)