TY - JOUR
T1 - A model of (often mixed) stereotype content
T2 - Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition
AU - Fiske, Susan T.
AU - Cuddy, Amy J.C.
AU - Glick, Peter
AU - Xu, Jun
PY - 2002/6
Y1 - 2002/6
N2 - Stereotype research emphasizes systematic processes over seemingly arbitrary contents, but content also may prove systematic. On the basis of stereotypes' intergroup functions, the stereotype content model hypothesizes that (a) 2 primary dimensions are competence and warmth, (b) frequent mixed clusters combine high warmth with low competence (paternalistic) or high competence with low warmth (envious), and (c) distinct emotions (pity, envy, admiration, contempt) differentiate the 4 competence-warmth combinations. Stereotypically, (d) status predicts high competence, and competition predicts low warmth. Nine varied samples rated gender, ethnicity, race, class, age, and disability out-groups. Contrary to antipathy models, 2 dimensions mattered, and many stereotypes were mixed, either pitying (low competence, high warmth subordinates) or envying (high competence, low warmth competitors). Stereotypically, status predicted competence, and competition predicted low warmth.
AB - Stereotype research emphasizes systematic processes over seemingly arbitrary contents, but content also may prove systematic. On the basis of stereotypes' intergroup functions, the stereotype content model hypothesizes that (a) 2 primary dimensions are competence and warmth, (b) frequent mixed clusters combine high warmth with low competence (paternalistic) or high competence with low warmth (envious), and (c) distinct emotions (pity, envy, admiration, contempt) differentiate the 4 competence-warmth combinations. Stereotypically, (d) status predicts high competence, and competition predicts low warmth. Nine varied samples rated gender, ethnicity, race, class, age, and disability out-groups. Contrary to antipathy models, 2 dimensions mattered, and many stereotypes were mixed, either pitying (low competence, high warmth subordinates) or envying (high competence, low warmth competitors). Stereotypically, status predicted competence, and competition predicted low warmth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036165718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036165718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
M3 - Article
C2 - 12051578
AN - SCOPUS:85036165718
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 82
SP - 878
EP - 902
JO - Journal of personality and social psychology
JF - Journal of personality and social psychology
IS - 6
ER -