Abstract
According to the person-affecting restriction, one distribution of welfare can be better than another only if there is someone for whom it is better. Extant problems for the person-affecting restriction involve variable-population cases, such as the nonidentity problem, which are notoriously controversial and difficult to resolve. This paper develops a fixed-population problem for the person-affecting restriction. The problem reveals that, in the presence of incommensurable welfare levels, the person-affecting restriction is incompatible with minimal requirements of impartial beneficence even in fixed-population contexts.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2779-2787 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 177 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Anonymity
- Incommensurability
- Person-affecting restriction
- Population ethics