TY - JOUR
T1 - A duality-based unified approach to bayesian mechanism design
AU - CAI, YANG
AU - DEVANUR, NIKHIL R.
AU - WEINBERG, S. MATTHEW
N1 - Funding Information:
\ast Received by the editors October 19, 2016; accepted for publication (in revised form) March 14, 2018; published electronically October 24, 2019. A preliminary version of this paper appeared in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1099583 \bfF \bfu \bfn \bfd \bfi \bfn \bfg : The first author's research was supported by NWO Vidi grant 639.022.211 and ERC consolidator grant 617951. The second author's research was supported in part by NSF awards CNS-1010789, CCF-1422569, and CCF-1749864 and by research awards from Adobe, Inc. The third author's research was supported by ERC starting grant 335288-OptApprox. \dagger Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, TU Eindhoven, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands (n.bansal@tue.nl). \ddagger Department of Computer Science and Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (srin@cs.umd.edu). \S School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland (ola.svensson@epfl.ch).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We provide a unified view of many recent developments in Bayesian mechanism design, including the black-box reductions of Cai, Daskalakis, and Weinberg [in Proceedings of the 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2013], simple auctions for additive buyers [S. Hart and N. Nisan, in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2012], and posted-price mechanisms for unit-demand buyers [S. Chawla, J. D. Hartline, and R. D. Kleinberg, in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2007, pp. 243-251]. Additionally, we show that viewing these three previously disjoint lines of work through the same lens leads to new developments as well. First, we provide a duality framework for Bayesian mechanism design, which naturally accommodates multiple agents and arbitrary objectives/feasibility constraints. Using this, we prove that either a posted-price mechanism or the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves auction with per-bidder entry fees achieves a constant factor of the optimal revenue achievable by a Bayesian Incentive Compatible mechanism whenever buyers are unit-demand or additive, unifying previous breakthroughs of Chawla et al. [in Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2010] and Yao [in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2015, pp. 92-109], and improving both approximation ratios (from 30 to 24 and 69 to 8, respectively). Finally, we show that this view also leads to improved structural characterizations in the framework of Cai, Daskalakis, and Weinberg.
AB - We provide a unified view of many recent developments in Bayesian mechanism design, including the black-box reductions of Cai, Daskalakis, and Weinberg [in Proceedings of the 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2013], simple auctions for additive buyers [S. Hart and N. Nisan, in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2012], and posted-price mechanisms for unit-demand buyers [S. Chawla, J. D. Hartline, and R. D. Kleinberg, in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2007, pp. 243-251]. Additionally, we show that viewing these three previously disjoint lines of work through the same lens leads to new developments as well. First, we provide a duality framework for Bayesian mechanism design, which naturally accommodates multiple agents and arbitrary objectives/feasibility constraints. Using this, we prove that either a posted-price mechanism or the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves auction with per-bidder entry fees achieves a constant factor of the optimal revenue achievable by a Bayesian Incentive Compatible mechanism whenever buyers are unit-demand or additive, unifying previous breakthroughs of Chawla et al. [in Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2010] and Yao [in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2015, pp. 92-109], and improving both approximation ratios (from 30 to 24 and 69 to 8, respectively). Finally, we show that this view also leads to improved structural characterizations in the framework of Cai, Daskalakis, and Weinberg.
KW - Algorithmic game theory
KW - Approximation
KW - Duality
KW - Mechanism design
KW - Revenue optimization
KW - Simple auctions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111158713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111158713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1137/16M1100113
DO - 10.1137/16M1100113
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111158713
SN - 0097-5397
VL - 50
SP - STOC16160-STOC16200
JO - SIAM Journal on Computing
JF - SIAM Journal on Computing
IS - 3
ER -