A conversation on power and republicanism: an exchange between Mark Haugaard and Philip Pettit

Mark Haugaard, Philip Pettit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this exchange Haugaard and Pettit begin by discussing power and agency. They agree that while many inequalities are linked to deliberate agency, a significant number of inequalities comprise structural effects that are the unintended effect of social action. These are of normative concern: to prevent arbitrary domination and create a society in which everyone can pass the eyeball test. Some of these structures are naturalized, or reified, which often makes them appear less contestable. This includes private property, which is presented as part of the natural order of things, thereby often naturalizing domination. From these beginnings, the authors discuss the nature of the eye-ball and tough-luck tests, including: how they apply to culture, parent–child power, gender, and economic inequalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-39
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Political Power
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Keywords

  • domination
  • eye-ball test
  • freedom
  • Power
  • republicanism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A conversation on power and republicanism: an exchange between Mark Haugaard and Philip Pettit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this