TY - JOUR
T1 - A compression model for ultimate postbuckling shear strength
AU - Glassman, Jonathan D.
AU - Garlock, Maria Eugenia Moreyra
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge Theodore Zoli from HNTB Corporation and Dr. Jean H. Prévost from Princeton University for their insights. This research was made with Government support under and awarded by DoD , Air Force Office of Scientific Research , United States, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship , 32 CFR 168a, provided to Dr. Glassman. This research was also sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF), United States under grant CMMI-1068252 . All opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of the sponsors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - Tension field theory has traditionally been used to determine the ultimate postbuckling shear strength of steel plates. More than a dozen theories have been proposed in the last nine decades to describe and predict this phenomenon, and all are based on the tensile response of the web plate, referred to as tension field action. Alternatively, in this paper a compression approach for determining the ultimate postbuckling shear strength is studied. First, an experimentally-validated finite element model is used to examine the mechanics of plate shear buckling. The response is shown to be similar to axially compressed plates, but in this case the axial compression is acting on a diagonal. Then a physical model and formulation based on the compressive strength of the plate is developed for predicting the ultimate postbuckling shear strength of a plate. For common design parameters of most bridge and building structures, this compression approach produces strengths that are closer to experimental and finite element results than the best and commonly accepted formulation based on tension field action. Overall, the results of this study show that a compression approach to predicting the postbuckling shear capacity of plates is an honest representation of shear buckling mechanics and has good correlation to extensive experimental results, where in many cases improved correlation is seen compared to formulations based on tension field action.
AB - Tension field theory has traditionally been used to determine the ultimate postbuckling shear strength of steel plates. More than a dozen theories have been proposed in the last nine decades to describe and predict this phenomenon, and all are based on the tensile response of the web plate, referred to as tension field action. Alternatively, in this paper a compression approach for determining the ultimate postbuckling shear strength is studied. First, an experimentally-validated finite element model is used to examine the mechanics of plate shear buckling. The response is shown to be similar to axially compressed plates, but in this case the axial compression is acting on a diagonal. Then a physical model and formulation based on the compressive strength of the plate is developed for predicting the ultimate postbuckling shear strength of a plate. For common design parameters of most bridge and building structures, this compression approach produces strengths that are closer to experimental and finite element results than the best and commonly accepted formulation based on tension field action. Overall, the results of this study show that a compression approach to predicting the postbuckling shear capacity of plates is an honest representation of shear buckling mechanics and has good correlation to extensive experimental results, where in many cases improved correlation is seen compared to formulations based on tension field action.
KW - Plate buckling
KW - Plate girder
KW - Postbuckling
KW - Shear buckling
KW - Tension field
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957571820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957571820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.016
DO - 10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84957571820
SN - 0263-8231
VL - 102
SP - 258
EP - 272
JO - Thin-Walled Structures
JF - Thin-Walled Structures
ER -