A Brief History of Liberty—And Its Lessons

Philip Pettit

doi:10.1080/19452829.2015.1127502

A Brief History of Liberty—And Its Lessons

Philip Pettit

Center for Human Values

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Classical republicanism and classical liberalism divide on the understanding of freedom, the one taking it as non-domination, the other as non-interference. And essentially the same division survives today, with serious policy implications, between neo-republicanism and neo-liberalism.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	5-21
Number of pages	17
Journal	Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
Volume	17
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2015.1127502
State	Published - Jan 2 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Development

Keywords

Democracy
Freedom
Justice
Liberal
Republican

Access to Document

10.1080/19452829.2015.1127502

Cite this

@article{4fef8c02fbf64b4d8952b6a9509607cd,

title = "A Brief History of Liberty—And Its Lessons",

abstract = "Classical republicanism and classical liberalism divide on the understanding of freedom, the one taking it as non-domination, the other as non-interference. And essentially the same division survives today, with serious policy implications, between neo-republicanism and neo-liberalism.",

keywords = "Democracy, Freedom, Justice, Liberal, Republican",

author = "Philip Pettit",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Human Development and Capability Association.",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1080/19452829.2015.1127502",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "17",

pages = "5--21",

journal = "Journal of Human Development and Capabilities",

issn = "1945-2829",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Brief History of Liberty—And Its Lessons

AU - Pettit, Philip

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Classical republicanism and classical liberalism divide on the understanding of freedom, the one taking it as non-domination, the other as non-interference. And essentially the same division survives today, with serious policy implications, between neo-republicanism and neo-liberalism.

AB - Classical republicanism and classical liberalism divide on the understanding of freedom, the one taking it as non-domination, the other as non-interference. And essentially the same division survives today, with serious policy implications, between neo-republicanism and neo-liberalism.

KW - Democracy

KW - Freedom

KW - Justice

KW - Liberal

KW - Republican

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958916125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958916125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19452829.2015.1127502

DO - 10.1080/19452829.2015.1127502

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958916125

SN - 1945-2829

VL - 17

SP - 5

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

JF - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

IS - 1

ER -

A Brief History of Liberty—And Its Lessons

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this